Relocation of Gaza Palestinians

http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

Both parties to blame

Having blasted the new tyrannical administration set up by Barack Hussein Obama and his fellow Democrats, I will now make a statement which will surprise many.

The political party I fear the most is the Republican Party.

Why? Because the Republican Party SHOULD be the opposition party to this excessive spending and debt, and especially to tyranny resulting from the infringement of the rights of the citizenry of this nation. However, Republicans have abandoned capitalism in favor of a watered-down socialism rather than the blatant socialism of the Democrats. A vote for a Republican is no longer a vote for capitalism. We know where the Democrats are coming from, and we know what to expect from them. It is the socialism of the Republicans, the alleged "opposition party," which is the frightening reality.

When the provisions for an ungodly massive debt were being passed through Congress, Republicans were there feasting on the spoils. Earmarked funds were carefully arranged by them for their pet projects, and the pact was made with the devil.

The day is coming when Democrats will successfully finish the abolition of our Constitution and its accompanying Bill of Rights, and effectively remove our rights from public policy, when our free speech is taken away along with our guns, when the president will become the CEO of all business in the nation, when hospitals will all be government hospitals on the same par as charity and veterans' hospitals are today, when control of everything is finally in the hands of the government. Then, when the Republicans come back into power, they will NOT return these rights to the people. They will do as they have done in the past. They will enjoy the usurped rights as politicians, and a change of agenda will be the only change--the mechanisms of tyranny, being in place, will be merely exercised for conservative purposes rather than leftist ones. But the socialism and tyranny will remain.

Defense of the Right of Free Speech

Now free speech will soon be clamped down on, violating the First Amendment of the now-defunct Constitution of the United States. New Pentagon appointee Rosa Brooks is now putting forth the idea of LICENSING THE PRESS! This is suggested in an effort to maintain the "quality" of journalism.

Just to remind those tyrants who intend to take this right away from me and from all other Americans who defy the tyranny of the current government, here is the original text of the Constitution which you have defiled:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I remind you enemies of the free State that the Presidency does not have the right to legislate at all, much less to set policies which infringe on the rights of the citizens. We live in a republic, NOT a mob-rule democracy.

Take the presses away, take the Internet away, take my pen and paper, and I will still write in defiance of this government which is usurping American freedom, and I will do so in my own blood on oak leaves if I have to.

“A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.”

Gerald R. Ford
Address to a Joint Session of Congress
August 12, 1974

The President of the United States bowing before a Muslim ruler:



The President of the United States with a cross and an "IHS" (Latin symbol of Jesus) sanitarily removed from the backdrop:


Any questions?

Several millions of Americans protested yesterday against increased national debt, yet Newsweek, CNN, ABC News, and MSNBC websites do not mention it--as though it simply didn't happen. The CBS News site only mentions it in passing.

People will still try to claim that the American media is not biased.

My comment for today, in the wake of the tax protests of millions of Americans yesterday, is to simply quote Neil Boortz:

Obama says that Americans need a "government that is working to create jobs and opportunity for them, rather than simply giving more and more to those at the very top in the false hope that wealth will trickle down."

No, no and hell no. It is not the role of the government to create jobs for people. There is this little thing called the private sector that is far more capable of providing jobs for people. But the more you tax the small business owners and the entrepreneurs and the evil rich ... the more jobs government is going to create, because it is squeezing out the private sector! Also ... and do I really need to say this? ... the government doesn't "give" to those at the very top. Those at the very top EARN. They ACHIEVE! The government doesn't GIVE to them .. the government TAKES from them .... And then gives to those at the bottom and call it tax cuts.

"Squeezing out the private sector" is the goal of socialists and communists. The real agenda should be self-evident here.

With the government takeover of major banks and financial institutions, my prediction is that the hospitals will be next.

Once the Democrats gain control of our arms (through gun control), our money (through bank and insurance takeovers), our transportation (through auto company takeovers), and our free speech (by politically targeting journalists and smearing critics like "Joe the Plumber"--and maybe eventually, me) what freedom will we have left?

Today, the crooked and idiotic islamocommunist we dumbass Americans elected as our president had the gall to say that instead of terrorism, India and Pakistan should focus on their common enemy of poverty.

What kind of idiocy is this? Mr. Obama speaks here with the voice of a pampered American who does not have to worry (yet) about getting blown up while going shopping as most Indians have to do today. What kind of fool thinks that poverty is a greater threat to India's stability than violence? Or thinks that getting Indians and Pakistanis together to hold hands and sing songs (or worse, do a similar type of "community organizing" of Obama's pre-election days, and create a welfare class in the Indian subcontinent as well) will somehow end Pakistani-sponsored terrorism? Is violence in India merely the product of poverty, as our idiotic leader seems to think? Are the religio-political factors to be swept under the carpet since they do not fit with the political correctness of the U.S. Democratic party, the Congress Party of India, or the Pakistani government?

The introduction of capitalism to India in the early 1990's has brought about the most prosperity that India has experienced since independence. By tapping into the talent of Indians, this economic change has put India in the ranks of a growing world power. This capitalism, until now, was the backbone of the American system which produced the prosperity Americans have enjoyed for generations and which propelled the U.S. into a top global position.

It is this same capitalistic sytem which has catapulted Indian Americans into the highest ranks in American society today.

Now Obama wants to deprive Indians and Indian-Americans from experiencing that prosperity by bringing socialism to the United States instead of capitalism to India. Wasn't socialism the course India has tried for the last several decades and which failed to alleviate poverty? Now blocks are being set up for Indians to get H1B visas, and U.S. companies will be penalized for hiring Indians. If the company is a victim of government takover, no H1B workers will be hired (though I suspect Mexican and Central American illegals will continue to do manual labor and janitorial work for the U.S. government owned companies).

Yes, Obama wants to bring the same socialism (or worse) into the United States, by attacking journalists who exercise their right to free speech, by limiting our right to bear arms, by gaining complete control over money and finances by bank takeovers, by taking over the automobile manufacturers, and by buying out failing companies with our tax dollars and setting them up as government-managed companies, with a new CEO in the oval office.

"I am a strong believer in the ability of the free market to generate wealth and prosperity that’s shared across the board." - Barack Hussein Obama
---
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher
--------------------------------

---
Living in the USSA, the Obama nation--more socialist by the day .

Instead of asking, "What can we do to fairly bail out AIG?" let's ask "Why the hell are we bailing out AIG?"

Can we not learn a lesson here? The AIG directors failed miserably, and the government proves them to still be far more competent at running a company than the damned members of Congress are. After botching up AIG, do Americans want the government in charge of HEALTH CARE now? Are we Americans that stupid?

If the government is going to get involved in running free market businesses, why only buy out the losers? Why not buy out Google or some successful company so we can MAKE money instead of wasting it? (Know that I am joking here. We all know what would happen to Google in the hands of our incompetent politicians. In fact. let's sell our government to Google instead. Our debt will be reduced, but we will have to be damned sure Pelosi, Dodd, and the other crooks don't get bonuses on their way out.)